Logo and Side Nav
News
Velit dreamcatcher cardigan anim, kitsch Godard occupy art party PBR. Ex cornhole mustache cliche. Anim proident accusamus tofu. Helvetica cillum labore quis magna, try-hard chia literally street art kale chips aliquip American Apparel.
Search
Browse News Archive
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Anna Karenina
While recent advances in computing open new possibilities for visualizing patterns in cultural artifacts, we can find many important precursors created much earlier without use of computers. For example, beginning in the early 1960s, many media and later new media artists have been restructuring TV programs and films in a variety of ways (slowing down, speeding up, sampling and repeating, etc.) to reveal ideological and formal patterns in this media content. Another relevant practice is the use of diagrams by artists, choreographers, architects, composers and others to plan and analyze their own works.
We can also find interesting precursors in print culture. For instance, a familiar book index can be understood as a visualization technique. Looking at the book index you can quickly see if particular concepts or names are important in this book – they will have more entries than the concepts that take up only a single line in the index.
This visualization of the complete text of Anna Karenina is inspired by a common reading practice of underlining important lines and passages in a text using magic markers. To create this visualization I wrote a program that reads the text from a file and renders it in a series of columns running from top to bottom and from left to right as a single image it also checks whether text lines contain particular words (this version checks for the word Anna) and highlights the found matches.
(Note: Because Flickr limits maximum resolution and file size of photos it can show, I had to break the visualization into two parts.)
Data: The compete text of Lev Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina (English translation: Constance Garnett). Number of words: 351,000. Number of lines: 43,200.
Timescale: The novel was published in serial installments from 1873 to 1877 in the periodical The Russian Messenger.
Mapping: The text of the novel is arranged on a single page. Reading order: top to bottom, left to right.
Links:
more visualizations of Anna Karenina and Hamlet (Flickr)