Logo and Side Nav
News
Velit dreamcatcher cardigan anim, kitsch Godard occupy art party PBR. Ex cornhole mustache cliche. Anim proident accusamus tofu. Helvetica cillum labore quis magna, try-hard chia literally street art kale chips aliquip American Apparel.
Search
Browse News Archive
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
digital humanities ++ | Manovich's course at UCSD, spring 2011
complete course syllabus: digital humanities++
Keywords: digital humanities, Calit2, UCSD, NEH, HIPerSpace, visualization, cultural analytics, softwarestudies.com, software studies, Lev Manovich
------------------------------------------------------
course description:
“How does the notion of scale affect humanities and social science research?
Now that scholars have access to huge repositories of digitized data—far more than they could read in a lifetime—what does that mean for research?”
The description of joint NEH/NSF Digging into Data competition (2009) organized by Office of Digital Humanities at the National Endowment of Humanities (the U.S. federal agency which funds humanities research).
“The next big idea in language, history and the arts? Data.”
New York Time, November 16, 2010.
Over the last few years, digital humanities - use of computational tools for cultural analysis - has been rapidly expanding, with growing number of grants, panels and presentations at conferences, and media coverage. (For example, New York Times is running a series of articles about digital humanities, with 5 articles already in print since November 2010.) However, most of the projects so far focused on text and spatial data (literature and history departments). With a few exceptions, other fields including art history, visual culture, film and media studies, musicology, and new media have yet to start using computational methods. But even in social sciences, the disciplines which are dealing with culture (media studies, cultural sociology, anthropology) and which employ quantitative methods, still did not discover full possibilities of "cultural computation." In short: the opportunities are wide open, and it is an exiting time to enter the field.
This graduate seminar explores the concepts, methods, and tools of computational cultural analysis, with a particular focus on the analysis of visual and interactive media. (This is also the focus of our lab's cultural analytics research).
We will discuss cultural, social and technical developments which gave us "large cultural data" (digitization by cultural institutions, social media) and which placed "information" and "data" in the center of contemporary social and economic life (the concepts of information society, network society, software society)
We will critically examine the fundamental paradigms developed by modern and contemporary societies to analyze patterns in data - statistics, visualization, data mining. This will help us to employ computational tools more reflexively. At the same time, the practical work with these tools will help us to better understand how they are used in society at large - the modes of thinking and inquiry they enable, their strengths and weaknesses, the often unexamined assumptions behind their use.
(This approach can be called reflexive digital humanities.)
We will discuss theoretical issues raised by computational cultural analysis: selecting data (single artifacts vs. sample vs. complete population); meanings vs. patterns; analyzing artifacts vs. analyzing cultural processes; methodologies for analyzing interactive media; combining established humanities methods with computational methods.
The course assumes that while computational methods can be used in the service of existing humanities questions and approaches, they also have radical potential to challenge existing concepts and research paradigms, and lead to new types of questions. To engage this potential, we have to start by considering "contemporary techniques of control, communication, representation, simulation, analysis, decision-making, memory, vision, writing, and interaction" enabled by software in society at larger. (Manovich, Introduction to Software Takes Command.) Projecting these techniques onto the problem of cultural analysis will tell us what digital humanities can be.
The seminar combines readings, discussion, exercises to learn tools and techniques, and collaborative work in groups to conduct original digital humanities projects. Students will be able to use any of the data sets already assembled by Software Studies Initiative (see examples) as well as the unique supervisualization HIPerSpace system.