Logo and Side Nav
News
Velit dreamcatcher cardigan anim, kitsch Godard occupy art party PBR. Ex cornhole mustache cliche. Anim proident accusamus tofu. Helvetica cillum labore quis magna, try-hard chia literally street art kale chips aliquip American Apparel.
Search
Browse News Archive
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
"Art Now" and "Graphic Design" Flickr groups (340,000 images)
Project start date: July 2011.
The availability of massive amounts of cultural content online allows us to start asking lots of interesting questions which were unthinkable before social media. For example: what is the "shape" of user-generated art? If we look at large enough sample of art images people upload, will see a number of distinct styles? Or will we see an endless variability? is there any significant differences between images which are labeled by their creators as "art"
and images from other areas of visual culture (graphic design, motion graphics, etc.)?
For this project we downloaded all images from two large Flickr groups: Art Now (apps. 170,000 images) and Graphic Design (also appr. 170,000 images).
Art Now (169,681 items)
http://www.flickr.com/groups/37996597808@N01
A group for displaying, fostering awareness and discussing the emerging relevant art and artists of today.
Graphic Design (177,700 items)
http://www.flickr.com/groups/graphicdesign/
Anything from drawings you did in Paint to photoshoped images. If you made it, put it in the pool.
(These numbers are for the images which were available in these groups when we did our download in August 2011; as group members continue to add new images, the numbers continue to grow).
We used our custom software to process the images on the Macs in our lab, extracting 400 features from each image. The features characterize images' tones, colors, shapes, lines, texture, and other visual characteristics. The next step is to visualize two image sets according to these features.
Our initial research questions are:
- what kinds of clusters (based on visual characteristics) can be find
in each group?
- in what ways the first group and the second group overlap, in how they
are different?
- are there some specific properties of the images done with computer
graphics ? Are these properties the same for two sets?