James Willford. Graphing Culture. Humanities. March/April 22, number 2.
Logo and Side Nav
News
Velit dreamcatcher cardigan anim, kitsch Godard occupy art party PBR. Ex cornhole mustache cliche. Anim proident accusamus tofu. Helvetica cillum labore quis magna, try-hard chia literally street art kale chips aliquip American Apparel.
Search
Browse News Archive
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
:
Thursday, March 10, 2011
article about cultural analytics research in NEH Humanities magazine
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
New article on computational analysis of one million manga pages
Article: Jeremy Douglass, William Huber, Lev Manovich. Understanding scanlation: how to read one million fan-translated manga pages. Forthcoming in Image and Narrative, Spring 2011.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Research on Remix and Cultural Analytics, by Eduardo Navas

Image: Composite image of four YouTube video remixes. From top left to bottom right appear thumbnail montages of Charleston — Original Al & Leon Style!!, Charles Style, Charleston Mirror, and Charleston Mix. Larger images of the montages with proper explanation are included below as part of this introduction to my initial research on viral videos.
As part of my post doctoral research for The Department of Information Science and Media Studies at the University of Bergen, Norway, I am using cultural analytics techniques to analyze YouTube video remixes. My research is done in collaboration with the Software Studies Lab at the University of California, San Diego. A big thank you to CRCA at Calit2 for providing a space for daily work during my stays in San Diego.
What follows is a brief introduction of my preliminary interest on video remixes and how I plan to use cultural analytics to evaluate their evolution on YouTube. My current research consists of various elements, some which I will not introduce at length today, but will only mention to contextualize the use of video grid montage as an analytical tool.
Read the complete entry at Remix Theory
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
presentation at National Department of Energy Research Center (NERSC)
In the Fall 2009, we assembled a data set containing 1,074,790 unique manga pages. We then used our custom software system running on a supercomputer at at (NERSC) to analyze visual features of these pages (funded by Humanities High Performance Award from NEH Digital Humanities Office.) Currently we are working on a series of articles which discuss our methods and discoveries - as well as the larger theoretical questions around quantitative analysis of large sets of cultural visual data.
Last week we visited Oakland Scientific Facility (part of NERSC) to present our research and discuss strategies for further collaboration. The visit was organized by Dr. Daniela Ushizima. Daniela who is a member of Analytics/Visualization and Math groups in Computation Research at the Lauwrence Berkeley National Laboratory. She was responsible for getting our project going at NERSC which was no small task. Thank you, Daniela!
Photo: Daniela, Lev, and Jeremy in front of one of supercomputers at NERSC.
Monday, December 6, 2010
2008 U.S. Presidential Campaign Ads
Article: Tara Zepel. "Cultural Analytics at Work: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Online Video Ads." In Video Vortex Reader II: Moving Images Beyond YouTube, edited by Geert Lovink and Somers Miles, 234-249. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2011. [pdf 2.5 MB].
The visualizations that follow explore the potential connections between online video and political communication by analyzing a small sample set of commercial advertisements produced during the campaign. Highlighted here are the differences and patterns found in visual form between two subsets of the sample: 1) between ads originally designed for television broadcast and ads original designed for web broadcast and 2) between ads for Obama and ads for McCain.
__________________
Research Findings:
- While all campaign ads in the sample set were posted and distributed on the web, those ads designed for television broadcast are visually different than ads designed for web broadcast across a number of visual dimensions.
- Comparing the television ads for both candidates leads to similarly counterintuitive observations: McCain’s TV ads are more visually aggressive and radical in visual language than Obama’s.
Sample Set of 2008 U.S. Presidential Campaign Ads:

Still frames and titles for each of the 12 campaign ads analyzed. 8 ads (4 Obama and 4 McCain) were aired on television and distributed on the web. 4 ads (2 Obama and 2 McCain) were aired exclusively online. All ads in the sample were officially produced and made available by the campaigns with the exception of D6, which was produced by the Democratic National Committee. All ads are available online on YouTube or at The Living Room Candidate, the Museum of the Moving Image's online archive of presidential campaign commercials 1952-2008.
__________________
Sample Set Visualizations:

Fig. 1. Comparison of Visual Change in Obama and McCain Video Ads.
‘Summary Images’: A superimposition of frames sampled at 12 fps for each video
Frame Diff. Line Graphs: x = frame number, y = pixel difference between consecutive frames
One way to look at aspects of visual change in the advertisements is to take a single ad as the unit of analysis. Fig. 1 shows a ‘summary image’ and 'frame difference line graph' for each of the 12 ads. Both visualization techniques depict parameters of visual change related to movement. In the summary images, the blurrier the summary image, the more the video content was changing over time. So, elements that remain discernible within the image are elements that remained in the same position throughout the ad. The frame difference line graphs are like a seismograph printout, a way of seeing the rhythm and magnitude of change over time. A spike marks a difference between two consecutive frames and taller the spike, the greater the magnitude of difference. This difference can correspond to a cut, a movement of the camera, the characters, animated text, graphics, or any other variety of visual change. Viewing these summary image and frame difference line graphs for each ad as a group allows us to see interesting patterns in visual change across the sample set:
- Web commercials are more static than commercials made for television. The summary images for the web commercials of both the Obama and McCain ads reveal more distinct textual, graphic and image content than the TV commercials of either candidate. Correspondingly, the line graphs for web commercials have a lower frequency and magnitude of visual change over time.
- McCain’s TV ads are more visually dynamic. The summary images for McCain TV commercials are noticeable blurrier than those produced by the Obama campaign. This is matched by the line graphs spiking more often and with greater intensity.
We can also zoom out and look for patterns in visual change by taking all frames in the sample set as the unit of analysis. Fig. 2 and 3 are image maps that take regularly sampled frames (at 12 fps) from all of the ads and represent them together on two dimensions.

Fig. 2a. ‘Image Map’ Comparison of TV Video Ads.
x-axis = mean grayscale value for all pixels in single frame
y-axis = mean standard deviation for pixel grayscale values in single frame

Fig. 2b. ‘Image Map’ Comparison of TV Video Ads.
x-axis = mean grayscale value for all pixels in single frame
y-axis = mean standard deviation for pixel grayscale values in single frame

Fig. 3a. ‘Image Map’ Comparison of Obama TV ads.
x-axis = mean grayscale value for all pixels in single frame
y-axis = mean standard deviation for pixel grayscale values in single frame

Fig. 3b. ‘Image Map’ Comparison of McCain TV ads.
x-axis = mean grayscale value for all pixels in single frame
y-axis = mean standard deviation for pixel grayscale values in single frame
__________________
What Cultural Analytics Tells Us About the 2008 U.S. Presidential Campaign Ads:
If we compare patterns across a larger number of visual characteristics and condense our image analysis to sample-wide averages, keeping in mind the comparatively detailed explorations discussed thus far, we can observe general trends in the visual form of the campaign advertisements across multiple dimensions of measurement:


There is a difference between the campaigns in the visual characteristics and form they choose to broadcast on the traditional political advertising medium of television. And interestingly, the results of digital image analysis challenge our prior assumptions. If the Internet was indeed a revolutionary force in the 2008 U.S. presidential campaigns, then we might expect to see this change reflected in the visual design of campaign advertising and communication. As the numbers reveal, we do. However, the implications and parameters of the patterns that emerge from the data may deviate from our expectations about how developing medium of online video should look and should function. Based on surrounding political rhetoric, public opinion and party lines, we might expect that media team for Obama, the younger and popularly labeled more “dynamic” candidate would design commercial advertisements that showcase this dynamism. Yet, at least for this small sample set, visual analysis reveals otherwise. John McCain’s TV ads comparatively more visually radical, at least for the small-scale sample set of this study. Could there be a political message correlated with the design of the McCain TV ads that asserts ‘maverick’ in response to Obama’s message of ‘change?’ Maybe. Further, why is this pattern visible in ads produced for television and not those produced for the web? If we’re interested in the looking at the changing face of political communication , these questions might be worth pursuing.
__________________
Links:
more visualizations of the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign ads (Flickr)
"Analyzing patterns in media content with supercomputers and supervisualization" / Calit2 Auditorium / Dec 3 / 4:10-4:25pm
Calit2 Auditorium / Dec 3 / 4:10-4:25pm
title:
Analyzing patterns in media content with supercomputers and supervisualization
description:
Cultural Analytics is a new methodology for media research which takes
advantage of the next generation cyberinfratsrutcure tools being
developed at Calit2. We use digital image analysis and interactive
visualization to explore patterns across large sets of images and
video - including films, animations, video games, comics, print
publications, web sites, and other media content. The talk will
highlight our current work with 1,000,0000 manga images
to analyze the relations between visual style, genre, and audience segments.
More information: softwarestudies.com.
-----------------------------------------
Exploring one million manga images on 287 megapixel HIPerSpace on supervisualization system at Calit2, San Diego.
This photo: Jeremy Douglass (Post-doctoral researcher, Software Studies Initiative) and Florian Wiencek (Jacobs-University, Bremen)